[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another proposal.

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:28:37PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > To state my view directly, I strongly feel that in an election with
> > no supermajority or quorum requirement, the default option should be
> > treated as any other.
> >
> > Does anyone have a good argument against that?

I misread your question.  Sorry.

However, that in the Nov 18 draft, every election has a quorum
requirement.  [The winning option must receive at least one vote in
every election.]

In other words, from my point of view, you're asking an irrelevant



Reply to: