Re: Another proposal.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:28:37PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > To state my view directly, I strongly feel that in an election with
> > no supermajority or quorum requirement, the default option should be
> > treated as any other.
> > Does anyone have a good argument against that?
I misread your question. Sorry.
However, that in the Nov 18 draft, every election has a quorum
requirement. [The winning option must receive at least one vote in
In other words, from my point of view, you're asking an irrelevant