Re: RFD: informal proposal
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:24:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:31:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:41:46PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > What do you think of the idea of repeatedly re-using the votes with
> > > supermajority and default swapped, after adopting an option with
> > > supermajority, until the result stops changing?
> I don't understand all this thing about changing defaults and so.
> Is it not enough to say that in a 2:1 supermajority case for option A,
> each vote for option A is halved, and then we run the election normally
No, it's not.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''