[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - non-free software removal

>>"John" == John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:

 John> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:17:10PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 >> No, we actually went to having a GR proposed, wich is still
 >> alive, though currently on hold waiting for the voting GR.

 John> My understanding was that the previous GR was considered
 John> expired under section A(5) of the Constitution.

	Technically, yes. But at that time, when we tabled
 discussions, the understanding was when the election methods
 committee comes back with a recommendation, the discussions would be

 John> If I was in error, that's fine.  In that case, I would
 John> contemplate calling with the withdrawal for the 2000 draft so
 John> that we may instead vote on the 2002 draft, which I believe is
 John> the better one.

	Well, reviving the old draft would be done by reproposing it,
 so yes. 

 John> I'd like to see if anyone cares much one way or other about the
 John> 2000 or 2002 proposal.  If this happens, I'd intend to wait to
 John> issue the CFV on the 2002 draft until after the other issues
 John> are decided.  Am I properly dotting all my i's with this plan?

 >> Thank you. As soon as your draft is in, I'll move to open the
 >> 3 week discussion period.

 John> Doesn't that discussion period automatically open once the
 John> draft is posted? 

	Proposed and sponsored.

 How much for your women?  I want to buy your daughter... how much for
 the little girl? Jake Blues, "The Blues Brothers"
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: