On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Shouldn't the quorom be counted at the same time the supermajority is? ie: > "If a quorum is required for an option, there must be [...] default > option. If there are not, then that option is discarded, and reference > to it in ballot papers will be ignored." Alternatively (6) should be moved > to after the winner is determined. Doing it that way would make the method > less decisive than otherwise. Oh, also, it was considered ambiguous by some last time round whether the setps in that section of the constitution were intended to be taken in order, or if they could be rearranged if that was the only way to make sense of them, or what. It'd be good to clarify that now too. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature