On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 10:00:43PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Jun 10, Branden Robinson wrote: > > It's easier to bog down John's proposal in parliamentary bureaucracy if you > > couch your diametrically opposed proposal as an amendement. > > Translation: it is easier to defeat John's proposal if a clearly > defined alternative is proposed to be voted upon at the same time. And this is impossible with a separate proposal how? > In any event, I don't think the intent of this amendment was to > deceive John into adopting it. Anthony just wants to make sure that > all options are on the table when we vote. Can you argue with that > desire? And this is impossible with a separate proposal how? -- G. Branden Robinson | Somebody once asked me if I thought sex Debian GNU/Linux | was dirty. I said, "It is if you're branden@ecn.purdue.edu | doing it right." roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Woody Allen
Attachment:
pgpU9xEedFcd1.pgp
Description: PGP signature