Re: Putting the smith back in smith/condorcet [re-call for sponsors]
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:26:28AM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> Your procedure for determining the Smith Set is dependent upon
> computing the transitive closure of the pairwise victories (the
> "beatpaths"). But the definition of the Smith Set doesn't depend on
> beatpaths at all.
Drat, you're right. This is the same example that tripped me up before
(Message-ID: <[🔎] 975686545.b120375b@debian.org>).
Bleah. Proposal withdrawn. [Why couldn't someone have poked holes in
it before I wrote it up? I guess it was too ambiguous a that point.]
I need to get some sleep. I'll give it another shot tomorrow.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: