Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5
>>"Peter" == Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net> writes:
>> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>>
>> 4.1. Powers
>>
>> Together, the Developers may:
>> 2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
>> + 5.2 Initially, the list of foundation Documents consists
>> + of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
>> + documents known as the Debian GNU/Linux Social Contract and the
>> + Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
>> + that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
>> + by the developers provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
Peter> Is it wise to let amendments to the constitution be regulated by two
Peter> rules? Why not drop the first rule to improve maintainability.
Where do you see two rules to regulate constitutional
amendments? One rules is for the constitution, the other rule is on
how to amend a totally separate list of Foundation documents.
manoj
--
"Is it just me, or does anyone else read `bible humpers' every time
someone writes `bible thumpers?' Joel M. Snyder, jms@mis.arizona.edu
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: