Re: [BALLOT] Social Contract Change Amendment
You are absolutly correct and did a better job explaining it (on both
accounts).
Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 10:51:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 08:06:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > You can vote either way here without liking the one you vote for
> > > today. For example, you might think both are horrible ideas, but
> > > think John's is certain not to pass but Anthony's might. In that
> > > case, you would vote not to accept the amendment, and then vote
> > > NO on the second ballot no matter what.
> >
> > so we will see a second ballot? that explains a lot! :)
>
> I do believe so, though I have asked the Secretary for a
> clarification.
>
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< *
* Debian: Software in the Public Interest: *
* Project Secretary Treasurer *
* Webmaster Team *
* BTS Team siteROCK: *
* Lintian Team Linux Infrastructure Engineer *
Reply to: