[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] disambiguation of 4.1.5

I Second this 

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:05:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> ======================================================================
>  4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>    4.1. Powers
>     Together, the Developers may:
>      1. Appoint or recall the Project Leader.
>      2. Amend this constitution, provided they agree with a 3:1 majority.
>      3. Override any decision by the Project Leader or a Delegate.
>      4. Override any decision by the Technical Committee, provided they
>         agree with a 2:1 majority.
> -    5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> +    5. Issue, modify, and withdraw nontechnical policy documents and
> +       statements.
>         These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
>         relationship with other free software entities, and nontechnical
>         policies such as the free software licence terms that Debian
>         software must meet.
>         They may also include position statements about issues of the day.
>      6. Together with the Project Leader and SPI, make decisions about
>         property held in trust for purposes related to Debian. (See
>         s.9.1.)
> ======================================================================
>  Rationale: The clause being modified has been seen recently to be quite
>  ambiguous. Since the original wording appeared to be amenable to two
>  wildly different interpretations, this change adds clarifying language to
>  the constitution about _changing_ or withdrawing nontechnical documents.
>  Furthermore, this amended proposal does not include any orthogonal issues
>  such as whether there exist any specific nontechnical documents that
>  should require unusual amendment procedures.  I think such issues should
>  be decided on separately, since it is quite possible that reasonable
>  developers can feel that the above is a reasonable clarification of the
>  Constitution with such belief necessitating a particular position on the
>  issues of special nontechnical documents, their identity, or their
>  amendability.
> ======================================================================

Peter 'darkewolf' Crystal
email   : darke@debian.org || darke@indigo.net.au || darkewolf@cyberpunks.org
url     : http://cyberpunks.org/darke/homepage.phtml
url     : http://netverse.sourceforge.net/
gpg key : http://cyberpunks.org/keys/darke_gpg.asc 

"Abair ach beagan agus abair gu math e."

Attachment: pgptGPX0dtU0n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: