[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:06:41PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:03PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > The requisite discussion period having been entertained, I therefore
> > formally call for a vote on this topic, on the Resolution which I
> > originally posted on June 7, 2000, a copy of which is included below.
> your CFV is unconstitutional because nothing in the consitution allows
> the Social Contract or DFSG to be amended.

Has the project secretary ruled on this yet? If not, it doesn't seem
reasonable to state this as fact.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
                 We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
                                      -- Dave Clark

Attachment: pgpr6Abm2AEfB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: