Re: Leadership Debate
[ I'm replying to myself but i'm starting a new thread ]
Le Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
> I hope I'm not too late because I have some questions. It's about QA.
So the debate has happened, some questions weren't asked. Thus I'd
like that each candidate try to answer them.
Here they are :
> I think that we need better rules for QA. What do they plan to do for QA ?
> What do they think about things like that :
> - We should enforce that every developer MUST be suscribed to
> debian-devel-announce (and debian-devel-announce must be moderated).
> - We should enforce developer to always respond within 15 days or to mark
> themselves as "absent" (using the nice & securized & web accessible
> - What about rules for managing critical bugs ? A maintainer should
> always correct a RC bug within 15 days (or a month ?). If not then NMU
> are allowed. If he really has good reasons for refusing NMU even after
> this delay, he should explain the reasons in a mail sent to the BTS
> (so that people looking at bug reports know about it)
> - Will they give the power to a team to orphan packages maintained by
> MIA developers (hopefully with Echelon results) ?
> - Will they push forward the new proposed release system (with stable,
> unstable and testing) ?
> If you can't push them all in the debate, i'd like that they respond to
> the questions later here on debian-vote.
Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
<pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd
Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>