Re: Negative Summary of the Split Proposal
- To: Debian Vote Discussion List <debian-vote@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Negative Summary of the Split Proposal
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:07:09 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990702070709.S1019@justice.loyola.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian Vote Discussion List <debian-vote@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <871zetryxn.fsf@dsp.net>; from Chris Waters on Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 05:33:40PM -0700
- References: <Pine.SOL.4.05.9906231443551.17862-100000@copland.udel.edu> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990629213941.11028I-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com> <19990630100506.Q21210@rdm.legislate.com> <19990630092025.B11896@quango2.watervalley.net> <87pv2disd4.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <19990630121414.A11688@humberto.polisci.olemiss.edu> <87n1xhwpfv.fsf@duomo.pukka.org> <19990630163005.G31707@debian.org> <871zetryxn.fsf@dsp.net>
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 05:33:40PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Richard wants us to remove non-free software from our main servers,
> > remove all mention of non-free software from our web pages, and remove
> > mention of non-free software from our installation and config files.
>
> Not at all true! He was, IIRC, perfectly happy with the suggestion
> that non-free repositories be listed in source.list as long as they
> were commented out *by default* -- or even commented out only if
> someone responded "yes" to a question like, "would you like to see
> only truly free software".
We can do that without moving things around...
Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgp5Cx8AKTEPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: