[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (3rd draft)



On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:58:33PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > So his other proposal is still valid and there's no point in recombining
> > the two.
> 
> Even with the split, updating the social contract with a new part 5 would
> mean that we have a part 5, which would cancel the effect of Andrew's
> deletion of part 5.

I haven't written the GR to surround it yet, but the two proposals are
designed to be completely independent. This problem will not occur and
they were (will be) both designed to avoid it.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: