On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:20:59AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:22:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > As a matter of practice, don't we generally distribute such CDs and > > brochures freely-licensed? > > AFAIK, even our own logo is under a non-free license. I might be > mistaken, though. (there has been an ironic comment on this matter by > somebody either on -private or -vote lately about this) The Open Use logo is freely licensed, isn't it? If it isn't, it should be. I suppose retaining restrictive licensing on the Official Use logo because I think it can have utility for purposes not directly relevant to the distribution of an operating system. However, this is very much a discussion for another list, like -project. -- G. Branden Robinson | You should try building some of the Debian GNU/Linux | stuff in main that is branden@debian.org | modern...turning on -Wall is like http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | turning on the pain. -- James Troup
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature