Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

[Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:04:11PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The real answer here is that we should seek a system where the most
> strategically beneficial vote is the one that's also sincere.
> Cloneproof SSD is supposed to provide this.  If the introduction of
> default options violates this property, that's something that should be
> considered.

I agree.

> That said, I don't agree with the claim that one can never prefer
> "further discussion" over any (or all) of the options on a ballot.

I don't think anyone made such a claim.  I certainly didn't.

Can we leave the straw men in the fields, please?  :)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    I must confess to being surprised
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    by the magnitude of incompatibility
branden@debian.org                 |    with such a minor version bump.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Manoj Srivastava

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature