On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:43:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:29:00 -0600, Graham Wilson <graham@debian.org> said: > > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:43:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > >> E) I say I'm willing to seriously consider breaking up my proposal > >> if > >> the Project Secretary can help me identify how many axes of > >> orthogonality he perceives in my original RFD. > > > FWIW, in my opinion there are five distinct changes that your > > proposal attempts to make to the social contract [1]: > > > 1. Remove the language saying the DFSG is "below", which makes the > > social contract and the DFSG separate. (3) > > > 2. Expand our committment to freedom beyond software. (4) > > Huh? We don't ship any hardware or wetware; and the author of > the sc has stated the sc was meant to cover everything on the > CD's. There is no expansion going on. Brandens original proposal calls for changing the wording of the SC to state that all works (software and non-software) must be covered under the DFSG. Sorry for not being very clear. -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature