Anthony Towns wrote: >What, exactly, is the point of removing non-free from the social contract, >if we're not going to remove non-free entirely? Hmm. To remove non-free, but not contrib? To add new restrictions on what can be in non-free? (Currently the only requirement for a package in non-free is that Debian can legally distribute it.) To move non-free to a separate FTP archive (rather than "areas in our FTP archive")? --Nathanael