Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

[Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>]

On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:22:50AM -0500, I wrote:
> [1] I don't see that there's any reason at all to agree that voting
> "further discussion" on irrelevant amendments is an insincere choice.
> 
> [2] I agree with Manoj, that if the secretary deems the ammendment to
> be orthogonal to the vote that the secretary has the power to put it on
> a separate ballot.

[3] The trivial "defense" against this "tactic" is to propose a new
amendment that combines both the original option and this new option.

This addresses the cases where the amendment is relevant and perhaps,
in some people's eyes, a better idea than the original proposal.

-- 
Raul