On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:32:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > But I don't see how this fits in with the constitution. We're operating, > I presume, under the `standard resolution procedure', ie appendix A. We've > has a proposal (Branden's, I guess) which has been proposed and seconded, > and we've had discussion and an amendment (Manoj's) which has apparently > received the appropriate number of seconds (A.1.1), and is presumably > being treated under A.1.3. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Manoj's and my proposals are wholly independent procedurally. This has been stated time and time again. One of them is NOT an amendment to the other. -- G. Branden Robinson | Measure with micrometer, Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk, branden@debian.org | cut with axe, http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | hope like hell.
Attachment:
pgpcrNcyx1eh8.pgp
Description: PGP signature