Re: Status of Proposals [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:12:22AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>  
>  [ ] yes to a                    
>  [ ] no to a                     [ ] yes to a AND b
>  [ ] yes to b          <===>     [ ] yes to b alone          
>  [ ] no to b                     [ ] further discussion
>  [ ] further discussion
> 


Would [ ] no to a and b be needed also ? 

So that you could vote for none of the changes without further discution (not
that that is what i want ot vote, bt the possibility should be there ...

Friendly,

sven Luther