On 2/25/11 6:56 AM, Camaleón wrote: > Hello, > > I just have read this notice: > > http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1003 > > And wonder if it is foreseen an update for Lenny's ClamAV to 0.97 that > has fixed this vulnerability. > > I'd like to ask the exact same question, except for squeeze. Seems that 0.97 isn't even in stable-proposed-updates, let alone the new stable-updates that is supposed to replace volatile. I have a feeling that we as a community have been cheated by the promise of volatile being deprecated and replaced by the new -updates suite.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature