On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:03:13PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > It looks to me like there are no armel binary packages at all in that > file, which says to me the armel autobuilder for volatile must be > broken. Phil, as you look after both autbuilding and volatile, can you > have a look? We didn't have autobuilders capable of autobuilding volatile until very recently (i.e. until the four new buildds arrived). The autobuilders already picked it up and stuffed it into lenny-proposed. It should pop up onto the mirrors shortly. Kind regards, Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature