Re: volatile Suitability for Protocol Updates
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb am Dienstag, den 19. Januar 2010:
Hi,
> On 18.01.10 12:51, Brian Ryans wrote:
> > Prescript: CCs to me are no longer necessary. I'm subscribed to
> > -volatile now. Thanks, Peter, for doing so.
>
> private Cc's are also forbidden on debian mailing lists, unless the poster
> asks for them.
>
> > Quoting Peter Pentchev on 2010-01-18 03:53:56:
> > > IMHO, the backports archive would be a better choice for this.
> >
> > from what you explain later on in your reply, I'm more heavily leaning
> > toward backports vs volatile.
>
> The backports is unofficial repository afaik.
Yes, but we are planning to have backports.d.o in the next days/weeks.
Alex
--
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
Reply to: