A recent thread on -user [1], and bug #565572 [2], have piqued my curiosity. Would the volatile archive be appropriate for fixing issues similar to what is described at those two links? On the page for volatile [3], it states: Some packages aim at fast moving targets, such as spam filtering and virus scanning This quote seems to imply that volatile is _not_ the proper place for package updates to fix protocol-change issues. In theory, protocols don't change often (aren't "fast moving targets" and in fact the protocol mentioned in [1,2] has only changed three times in my entire time using said protocol. Though, my reading of another part of that same paragraph seems to imply that it is indeed the appropriate location: So debian-volatile will only contain changes to stable programs that are necessary to keep them functional. [#include closed-protocol-rant.txt] As of 2010-01-17 06:56 UTC, I am not subscribed to the list, so if you reply before, say, about 7:15, please CC me. Thanks in advance. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/12/msg00583.html [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565572 [3] http://www.debian.org/volatile/ -- _ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against ( ) Brian Ryans HTML E-mail and V-cards X BrianLRyans@gmail.com www.asciiribbon.org / \ GPG Public Key 0xC11213D0 Key Fingerprint: 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature