Re: [Secure-testing-team] Security support for volatile?
> * Luk Claes:
>
> > Currently the security support for the volatile archive is supposed
> > to be taken care of by the uploaders of the respective packages.
> >
> > I think it would make sense to have someone or a team tracking
> > security issues for volatile.
> >
> > What do you think? Is anyone up to providing such issue tracking for
> > volatile?
On 22.02.09 22:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> For ClamAV and ClamAV-derived packages, I'd prefer to see uploads of
> new upstream versions to stable-security or stable-proposed-updates
> (that is, remove it from volatile).
May I know why? I think that volatile is exactly the place where they should
be.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod
Reply to: