[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: postgrey - propagating fix for #504382 to stable



This one time, at band camp, Marcin Owsiany said:
> I've been waiting for quite a while without any response to the
> following. Can someone with necessary powers please have a look?
> 
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 09:17:07AM +0000, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:18:12PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 November 2008 12.42:51 you wrote:
> > > > I've noticed that you uploaded postgre 1.32-2 (fixing #504382) to
> > > > unstable. Do you intend to propagate that also to etch and/or lenny?
> > > 
> > > Only via volatile, I don't think this is something for a freeze exception, 
> > > given that the new version adds (some few) features and given that I 
> > > changed some default settings and the packaging etc.
> > > 
> > > I plan to do an upload "soon" (had no time when I did 1.32-x); or you can 
> > > NMU to volatile (just take the old source package and slap the current 
> > > client whitelist in)
> > 
> > I'd like to upload the following change to etch-volatile.

The patch looks fine to me.  I'll wait for aba or zobel to ack, but I'd
be happy to take that if you could also provide a VUA snippet.

> > By the way, is it possible to upload do lenny-volatile yet?

Not last I looked.  The patch below is probably suitable for t-p-u, I
would have thought.

Cheers,
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: