Re: The ls command

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The ls command
From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:00:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] aQSI2FtD7gbZhOmV@phare.normalesup.org>
Reply-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAH8yC8m3T6Pgbk8ndSKc+YYNj_zD4byELvrasoJrYFYuibdAPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAN+UU9o756vQg1KPz13cjx0hDun55RLrxA5a-=4Nwco66UYo5A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] aQOC5LjAeAGNqG_W@phare.normalesup.org> <[🔎] CAH8yC8=H+V386m6=krWGmm+BBtFNVCop11Eb3m6LnuupMGq8DA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20251031033701.GD957218@qaa.vinc17.org> <[🔎] CAH8yC8m3T6Pgbk8ndSKc+YYNj_zD4byELvrasoJrYFYuibdAPQ@mail.gmail.com>

Jeffrey Walton (HE12025-10-31):
> > but the output has useless "./".

>     $ ls ./*.pdf
>     ./--K.pdf
      ^^
That is a useless “./”.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The ls command
  - From: Michael Paoli <michael.paoli@berkeley.edu>

References:
- The ls command
  - From: Michael <rapidmailservice@gmail.com>
- Re: The ls command
  - From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
- Re: The ls command
  - From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
- Re: The ls command
  - From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
- Re: The ls command
  - From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The ls command
Next by Date: Re: The ls command
Previous by thread: Re: The ls command
Next by thread: Re: The ls command
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread