[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Encrypt replies by default





On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 7:19 AM <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 07:11:17AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

[...]

> Add it to the list at The PGP Problem, <
> https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem/>:
>
>     Cryptography engineers have been tearing their hair out over PGP’s
>     deficiencies for (literally) decades. When other kinds of engineers get
>     wind of this, they’re shocked. PGP is bad? Why do people keep telling
>     me to use PGP? The answer is that they shouldn’t be telling you that,
>     because PGP is bad and needs to go away.
>
>     There are, as you’re about to see, lots of problems with PGP.
>     Fortunately, if you’re not morbidly curious, there’s a simple
>     meta-problem with it: it was designed in the 1990s, before serious
>     modern cryptography. No competent crypto engineer would design a system
>     that looked like PGP today, nor tolerate most of its defects in any
>     other design. Serious cryptographers have largely given up on PGP and
>     don’t spend much time publishing on it anymore (with a notable
>     exception). Well-understood problems in PGP have gone unaddressed for
>     over a decade because of this.

Much fluff, no content.

Perhaps you should read the whole article, and not the two introductory paragraphs that were cited.

Jeff 

Reply to: