[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: More effective searching



On 6/30/25 6:42 AM, Loris Bennett wrote:
Jan Claeys <lists@janc.be> writes:

On Tue, 2025-06-24 at 07:27 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Side Issue -- Google and DuckDuckGo seem more interested in quantity
rather than quality. Any pointers to search engine with friendly
Boolean search? TIA

"You" "can" "try" "putting" "double" "quotes" "around" "every" "word"
AND "word group" OR -use -dashes -to -exclude

https://www.lifehack.org/articles/technology/20-tips-use-google-search-efficiently.html
https://www.lifewire.com/bing-advanced-search-3482817

... might also be useful (DDG is based on Bing)

In the past with DDG '-' excluded and '+' included, but now that is no
the case.  Rather, to quote from

   https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/syntax

Thanks for the link. I'll be exploring it.
Also, the headings at https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/ are intriguing. Will also explore them.


the meaning is the following:

   cats -dogs	Fewer dogs in results
   cats +dogs	More dogs in results

Just after this change was made several years ago, I found that in some
cases, adding

   '-foo'

actually lead to more results containing 'foo' than when 'foo' was
omitted completely, presumably because less 'foo' is potentially still
more than no 'foo'.  I did complain to DDG at the time and I have the
impression that the issues has now been fixed.

Cheers,

Loris




Reply to: