Re: Who: Bookworm v. Trixie
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Who: Bookworm v. Trixie
- From: Troll <stappers@stappers.nl>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 07:20:48 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] Z+t3sO1oJL3czyOJ@gpm.stappers.nl>
- In-reply-to: <Z+sB8vqny2mSthEY@mail.bitfolk.com>
- References: <20250330162450.60721a4c@hawk.localdomain> <CAO6YxPwWn_0qKJZzujWEPjNX2YcuLXFhQoYoupdgh0mMkL0b0w@mail.gmail.com> <20250330191048.3db7a50f@peregrine> <CA+t9iMwHniQMGW58c-H99C3FSddu+TC8OsSDirPpWVAj0eEqMw@mail.gmail.com> <87v7rp7muj.fsf@noux.seestieto.com> <8960cb2a-7caf-4819-9188-29af2682bff4@shentel.net> <Z+pb3SE060rwCLCG@mail.bitfolk.com> <2340f7ba-950f-4a60-957b-62cf130034e6@shentel.net> <Z+sB8vqny2mSthEY@mail.bitfolk.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 08:58:26PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:19:30AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 3/31/25 05:10, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > Here is the bug report you quoted but did not read:
> > >
> > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080330
> >
> > > > I've read it now, but I'm disappointed at how this has been
> > > > treated. Pot called the kettle black and vice versa with zero
> > > > progress as bookworm is stuck on 9.1 while the rest of the planet
> > > > has moved on to at least 9.4 which works.
>
> The subject of this thread is coreutils in the forthcoming trixie
> release, where "who" is not particularly functional as discussed.
>
> I have no idea what tangent you are going off on now, and the rest of
> your off-topic and self-inflicted issues with hosts files will not be
> tackled (again) by me. All I will say for the archives is that as
> usual the complaints are entirely without merit.
Do not feed me
Reply to: