Re: Stunnel startup. Was "Native systemd services."

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Stunnel startup. Was "Native systemd services."
From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:40:37 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] vqo7r5$gvd$2@ciao.gmane.io>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20250309161532.BC73C2084F@bendel.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20250309040426.6643D207E3@bendel.debian.org> <[🔎] 20250309042823.GM14377@wooledge.org> <[🔎] 20250309161532.BC73C2084F@bendel.debian.org>

On 09/03/2025 23:15, peter@easthope.ca wrote:

https://wiki.debian.org/Pan . There we read,

To enable Stunnel edit /etc/default/stunnel4

ENABLED=1

/etc/default/stunnel4 exists but lacks ENABLED. My best guess is that
systemd obsoleted it. Stunnel needs https://wiki.debian.org/Stunnelwith current documentation.

Likely you have read the unit file and<file:///usr/share/doc/stunnel4/README.Debian>, so you may be a bettercandidate than other subscribers for updating the wiki.

Reply to:

References:
- Native systemd services.
  - From: peter@easthope.ca
- Re: Native systemd services.
  - From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
- Stunnel startup. Was "Native systemd services."
  - From: peter@easthope.ca

Prev by Date: Re: Could you recommend me a mature fuse filesystem which uses a single file as backing storage, and could self-growing?
Next by Date: Re: is there a bug in cp command ?
Previous by thread: Stunnel startup. Was "Native systemd services."
Next by thread: is there a bug in cp command ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread