Re: Firefox alternatives?
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 13:20:28 -0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 December 2024 06:00:37 pm Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > This makes memory leaks less common, but when they *do* occur, they're
> > quite difficult to find. Usually it means you've accidentally retained
> > a reference to the object in question in some part of the program that
> > never goes away.
>
> I'd really love it if firefox didn't consume increasing amounts of memory as time went on...
>
> Why would it do that? That's been the case for a long time over many versions.
Because finding and fixing memory leaks is *really difficult*. And not
much fun. And doesn't let you put fancy new blurbs on your "what's new"
page.
Reply to: