Re: utelnetd
Jeffrey, thanks for the reply. Decades since I've looked at a makefile.
Understanding is marginal.
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 22:39:32 -0500
> My guess is $PROGS is empty. But it is only a guess since the message
> is missing so much information.
>
> Maybe add a $(info $(PROGS)) before the 'all' recipe to see:
>
> $(info PROGS: $(PROGS))
> all: $(PROGS)
Inserted line "$(info PROGS: $(PROGS))" ahead of "all: $(PROGS)". That's
what you intended, correct?
Got this.
# make DEBUG=1 -f ./Makefile
PROGS: utelnetd
make: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
Confirms the assignment earlier in Makefile.
# grep utelnetd Makefile
# Makefile for utelnetd
CORE := utelnetd.core
PROGS = utelnetd
OBJS = utelnetd.o
According to this, libc.so is the only dependancy.
https://boxmatrix.info/wiki/Property:utelnetd
/usr# find . -type f -name "libc.so"
./lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so
Seems OK.
Something elementary and critical missing?
Thanks, ... P.
--
VoIP: +1 604 670 0140
work: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:PeterEasthope
Reply to: