Re: [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs

To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
From: "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:59:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] D30AZ186NS9D.ETZQQWLEX1ZJ@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZqNwlWxes2Si7j4O@phare.normalesup.org>
References: <[🔎] 073ea6ee-47c1-a2bd-a662-8e3716bc5644@molton.org.uk> <[🔎] cf8d05d5-66cd-017b-d47d-9d60aaea681d@molton.org.uk> <[🔎] 0b81d465-44fd-43e5-97d7-c1e94809e846@molton.org.uk> <[🔎] ZqNwlWxes2Si7j4O@phare.normalesup.org>

On Fri Jul 26, 2024 at 10:47 AM BST, Nicolas George wrote:
> Now maybe you fix your MUA configuration to not omit “Re: ”.

What would that achieve?

-- 
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻	Jonathan Dowland
✎	 jmtd@debian.org
🔗	https://jmtd.net

Reply to:

References:
- Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
  - From: Ian Molton <debian_user-ian@molton.org.uk>
- [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
  - From: Ian Molton <debian_user-ian@molton.org.uk>
- [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
  - From: Ian Molton <debian_user-ian@molton.org.uk>
- Re: [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
  - From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
Next by Date: Re: info is not dead
Previous by thread: Oh "lashing back" [was: [SOLVED] potential bug?]
Next by thread: Re: [SOLVED] potential bug? - was Re: Problem with cryptsetup-initramfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread