[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why reliable linux hasn't gained more market share?





On 20/7/24 16:56, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 20 Jul 2024 10:28 +0200, fromgeorge@nsup.org  (Nicolas George):
Thank David! market share is important though it isn't "reliable
recommendation for quality": more users attract more programmers, who
develop more apps,
The programmers who are attracted by market share are not necessarily
the ones who are interested in developing quality and/or innovative
software, though.
A lot of paid-for programmer time isn't necessarily for what the
individual programmer_wants_  to do. If one's employer dictates that
their products should support Mac OS and Windows, for example, then
there's usually little that a programmer, no matter how motivated, can
do to extend that support to include Linux; especially if the product
in question is heavily dependent on OS-specific APIs.

There are plenty of applications that run O/S agnostic.

The earliest were the utterly awful apps in Java that thankfully are now biting the dust - "Write Once Run Anywhere" actually meant Write Once and run anywhere the identical JVM is in place and the identical O/S.

A while later QT came along and a lot of software uses the QT API fairly successfully.

Even later Javascript/Typescript have popped up so applications like Visual Studio Code run seamlessly on different O/S

And of course Python is now the language du jour and runs equally well on Windows and Linux especially in the AI realm.


Reply to: