Re: Debian Sid/Unstable is not a rolling user distro [WAS:Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size]

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Sid/Unstable is not a rolling user distro [WAS:Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size]
From: didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:27:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] v7d4h9$848$2@ciao.gmane.io>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] v7d4d2$848$1@ciao.gmane.io>
References: <[🔎] 20240718135021.e45e6ee5572c745b808cf822@gmail.com> <[🔎] 66998653.8090801@fastmail.fm> <[🔎] c52pmk-guu.ln1@anthive.com> <[🔎] v7d4d2$848$1@ciao.gmane.io>

Le 19/07/2024 à 09:25, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]

You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one i free to usewhich Debian distro one wants to...

[...]

typo error, sorry:

You are perfectly right: there is no contract and one is free to use
 which Debian distro one wants to...

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Re: Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size
  - From: Celejar <celejar@gmail.com>
- Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size
  - From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size
  - From: songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
- Debian Sid/Unstable is not a rolling user distro [WAS:Re: Kernel 6.9.9 (amd64) results in huge initrd / initramfs size]
  - From: didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com>