Me again, sorry.
Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!
Subject:
Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
This is the header:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
X-Envelope-From: bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org
DMARC-Filter:
OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=megamailservers.eu header.i=@megamailservers.eu header.b="QLjumGn/"
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org>
Received:
from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C5Iek122979 for
<hans.ullrich@loop.de>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailbox-Line:
From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024
Old-Return-Path: <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with
ESMTP id C18E42067A for <lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received:
from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
<lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight:
NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: .loop. -
helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
Received:
from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
[91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
(256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu,
4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Authenticated-User: 01793666059@o2online.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu;
s=maildub; t=1720094700; bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
Received:
from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109])
(authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with
ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
From: Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
Message-ID: <[🔎] 2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
References:
<[🔎] 3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <[🔎] 66868718.1030800@fastmail.fm>
<[🔎] 46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejudelhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsggvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhushgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg
X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjeduteekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg
X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];
MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[generic];
MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[82.195.75.100:from];
RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[82.195.75.100:from];
HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[];
FORWARDED(0.00)[lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org];
DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[megamailservers.eu:-]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
ARC_NA(0.00)[];
FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[m:debian-user@lists.debian.org,s:hans.ullrich@loop.de];
DMARC_NA(0.00)[loop.de]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[];
FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[hans.ullrich@loop.de,bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org];
R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
FORGED_SENDER_FORWARDING(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5];
FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[hans.ullrich@loop.de,bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_FORWARDING(0.00)[];
ASN(0.00)[asn:8365, ipnet:82.195.64.0/19, country:DE];
FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_EXCLAIM(0.00)[]
X-Origin-Country: DE
X-Origin-Country: DE
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <X8XMuV4H5dC.A.2f6J.7_ohmB@bendel>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/812910
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
List-Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[🔎] 2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2
Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-DA-Pass: W0T0
X-WHL: LR
Am Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2024, 13:58:07 CEST schrieb Hans:
Answering myself:
At the moment everything is looking fine.
Maybe after the big issue yesterday, the mail admins somewhere in the world
have fixed the problem? Dunno. Whatever, strange.....
I will watch this in the future.
Let's close this issue for now, so that this list is not too much filled with
unusefull spam.
However, if this issue appears again, I will allow myself to ask again for
help.
Thank you all for your quick response!
Best regards
Hans
> Hmm, this is strange. Maybe I wrote my testmail from scratch.
>
> This one is a reply as it have been, when the issue appeared.
>
> Strangely my own testmail appeared without the SPAM tag this time.
>
> Maybe there is a difference, if I am using a reply mail.
>
> I will watch this and search for more information.
>
> Hope, not everyone is replying now, only one feedback is enough.
>
> Thanks for help though.
>
> Best
>
> Hans
Looks like it is some DKIM problem. Maybe this is related to, which way my mail goes.
However, let us close this issue for now. There is even no way, I myself can fix this. I suppose, if Debian admins are responsible, they might read here or may not. But all in all, as I can do nothing, this issue is closed for me.
Happy hacking!
Hans