Re: Predictable network device names [was: Please help me identify package so I can report an important bug
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Predictable network device names [was: Please help me identify package so I can report an important bug
- From: Kamil Jońca <kjonca@o2.pl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:59:49 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87o785phdm.fsf@alfa.kjonca>
- In-reply-to: <IOKpH-2xdh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (tomas@tuxteam.de's message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:40:01 +0200")
- References: <IOpEC-2keE-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOtRU-2mJx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOBcJ-2rde-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOBw6-2rzb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOBFL-2rCi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOKpH-2xdh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IOKpH-2xdh-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
tomas@tuxteam.de writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:30:27AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [following up on myself, bad style, I know]
>
>> For my laptop, I very much prefer to say "sudo ifup eth0" than to
>> say "sudo ifup en0ps&&@*#!☠" thankyouverymuch :)
>
> and of course, if you are using a desktop environment and NetworkManager
> or systemd-networkd, it's probably better to go with the flow and let
> them do.
About year ago none of them was able to handle my config.
(Some interfaces used by vms , and proper snat for them.)
KJ
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
Reply to: