[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive



On 2/14/24 19:48, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:09:02PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
I have made 1 full partiton om each one, a labeled those partitions  as
SiPwr_0 and SiPwr_1

Please show us the command you used¹ to do that, so we know what
exactly you are talking about, because as previously discussed
there's a lot of different things that you like to call "partition
labels".

This is what gparted calls a "partition label" and certainly does not need a 4.5 megabyte camera image to see. or even a 50k screen snap. Taking this screenshot was a pita, because the gparted window disappears behind the terminal screen when you click on take another shot, so you have to quit, then find the gparted on the tool bar to bring it back to the front, then move it and the terminal so its not totally hidden. Then rerun spectacle again waste a click bringing it fwd, then 30 seconds later the spectacal instructions finally show up and after 5 minutes of screwing around, finally get the screen shot attached to prove I'm not lieing.

If we take that literally that would be a GPT partition name, but
you've used this same terminology before and meant a filesystem
label.

My only question it will those partition names survive lvcreating an 11T lvm
out of these and 2 more 2T gigastones.

Assuming you meant partition name the first time as well, nothing
you do other than a disk wipe or re-name should alter those
partition names.

But your chosen partition names don't make a lot of sense to me.
You've picked names based on the type/manufacturer of device so you
may as well have just used the names from /dev/disk/by-id/… which
already have that information and are already never going to change.
I don't know why you want to complicate matters.

If instead you put filesystems on these partitions and labelled
*those*, well, no, LVM goes under filesystems so those filesystems
and their labels (and contents) are not long for this world.

I have not dealt with an lvm in about 15+ years trying it once
when it first came out with a high disaster rating then.

I hope you are putting a level of redundancy under that LVM or are
using the redundancy features of LVM (which you need to go out of
your way to do). Otherwise by default what you'll have is not
redundant and a device failure will lose at least the contents of
that device, possibly more.

Regards,
Andy

¹ and while you are there, maybe a post-it note with "I will show
   the exact command I used any time I write to debian-user" stuck to
   the top of the display of the screen you use to compose emails
   would help, because basically every thread you post here lacks
   that information.


Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis

Attachment: gparted.png
Description: PNG image


Reply to: