Re: I've an editable .pdf form I need to fill out
On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 14:50:59 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
> On 1/21/24 14:29, John Hasler wrote:
> > Klaus writes:
> > > Did you notice, that I was talking about the reduced, crippled OpenSource
> > > browser: chromium
> >
> > I wrote:
> > > In what way is it crippled?
> >
> > Gene writes:
> > > Port 80 has been hijacked. You cannot send it to monitor your own web
> > > page at http://localhost:80, but the result is a 403 because google
> > > doesn't know WTH to do with localhost...
Why would that cause a permissions (403) error?
> > I just tried that. No hijacking: works fine.
> It was also true here using the file:// prefix, trying look at the
> html versions of the man pages in /usr/share/local/docs.
I don't understand why a file:// prefix would test whether port 80 worked.
Port 80 is for http:// isn't it?
> Firefox-esr
> can use that syntax just fine.
Which syntax, the one in your previous sentence or the one in your
previous post?
> Where the difference be?
Between what and what? You never seem to quote what you actually
put in the address bar together with what the outcome was.
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: