Re: smartctl cannot access my storage, need syntax help
On Sun 14 Jan 2024 at 14:48:49 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
> On 1/14/24 07:42, David Christensen wrote:
> > I am confused -- do you have 4 or 5 Gigastone 2 TB SSD?
>
> 5, ordered in 2 separate orders.
> >
> > > So that one could be formatted ext4 and serve as a backup of the raid10.
> What I am trying to do now, but cannot if it is plugged into a
> motherboard port, hence the repeat of this exercise on the 2nd sata
> card.
> >
> > > how do I make an image of that
> > > raid10 to /dev/sde and get every byte? That seems like the first step
> > > to me.
> This I am still trying to do, the first pass copied all 350G of /home
> but went to the wrong drive, and I had mounted the drive by its label.
> It is now /dev/sdh and all labels above it are now wrong. Crazy.
> These SSD's all have an OTP serial number. I am tempted to use that
> serial number as a label _I_ can control. And according to gparted,
> labels do not survive being incorporated into a raid as the raid is
> all labeled with hostname : partition number. So there really is no
> way in linux to define a drive that is that drive forever. Unreal...
Interesting to see in how many differents ways you can use the
term "label". BTW I have no idea what an "OTP serial number" is.
On Sun 14 Jan 2024 at 16:47:41 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
> ene@coyote:~/src/klipper-docs$ sudo smartctl -a /dev/sde
> [sudo] password for gene:
> smartctl 7.3 2022-02-28 r5338 [x86_64-linux-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-22, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
>
> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
> Device Model: Gigastone SSD
> Serial Number: GST02TBG221146
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
You see that there? You should find this symlink on your system:
/dev/disk/by-id/… …GST02TBG221146
pointing at some random /dev/sdX. Where you put /dev/sdX,
put /dev/disk/by-id/… …GST02TBG221146 instead. Then you'll
know you're referring to that disk. Likewise the others.
(As already suggested by David C, Sun, 14 Jan 2024 04:41:51 -0800)
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: