[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken too?



On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 08:02:03PM +0100, Kevin Price wrote:
> Am 09.12.23 um 19:09 schrieb Dan Ritter:
> > The new kernel release is reported to contain an ext4 data
> > corruption bug. It's prudent not to upgrade, or if you have
> > started to upgrade, not to reboot, until a new kernel release
> > is prepared.
> 
> Thanks for your announcement. I'm running out of time to properly report
> a bug against 6.1.66-1.
> 
> #1057843 states that it's fixed with 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1. This I highly
> doubt. I handpicked that version from
> https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/ , and installed the 6.1.66-1
> packages[1]. That was totally messed up and made my amd64 system highly
> unresponsive and erratic to the point it would hang shutting down. So I
> booted back into 6.1.0-13, which still works fine, and purged 6.1.0-14
> and 6.1.0-15, and IOT have two working options, I reinstalled 6.0.1-12,
> which had been autoremoved with the update.
> 
> [1] Packages I used:
> 
> [src:linux]
> linux-compiler-gcc-12-x86_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb
> linux-headers-6.1.0-13-amd64_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb
> linux-headers-6.1.0-13-common_6.1.55-1_all.deb
> linux-kbuild-6.1_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb
> linux-libc-dev_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb
> 
> [src:linux-signed-amd64]
> linux-headers-amd64_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb (optional meta-pkg)
> linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb
> linux-image-amd64_6.1.55-1_amd64.deb (optional meta-pkg)
> 
> Other versions I tried:
> 6.1.0-12/6.1.52-1 works
> 6.1.0-13/6.1.55-1 works
> 6.1.0-14/6.1.64-1 broken, according to #1057843
> 6.1.0-15/6.1.66-1 broken as experienced
> 
> For now, I've purged the broken ones, and put the working ones on hold
> with dpkg.
> 
> Any ideas?
> -- 
> Kevin Price
>

If you hand-picked packages: I would suggest using apt to upgrade the whole
system . 

For anybody who followed my initially erroneous advice to remove
linux-image-amd64 - installing that package should pull in 6.1.0-15
correctly as a dependency.

Kevin: Do you have any logs to show brokenness? For what it's worth,
there were other updates and fixes besides just #1057843 in the new
release.

With every good wish, as ever,

Andy
[amacater@debian.org]


Reply to: