[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: time question, as in ntp?



On 12/1/23 10:27, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 01/12/2023 17:42, gene heskett wrote:
On 11/30/23 23:18, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 01/12/2023 10:24, gene heskett wrote:

Then, please, explain clearly what is "networkmangler", what is "/e/n/i", and what particular evidences you have that namely "networkmangler" overwrites "/e/n/i".

=NetworkManager overwrites /etc/network/interfaces. Sheesh, part of the "slang-guage" for decades.

MetworkManager has well earned that alias. I have made it a habit to remove the x attribute of that headache.

I asked it because earlier you posted

root@mkspi:/etc# nmcli
-bash: nmcli: command not found

so I have to repeat it. You *do* *not* have NetworkManager installed hence it can not overwrite files.

What particular *evidences* do you have that namely NetworkManager overwrites /etc/network/interfaces? I am not interested in you *speculations*.

In a previous episode you blamed NetworkManager in breaking of /etc/resolv.conf. Actually it was you who put incorrect info into NetworkManager configuration:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZT-gj6fkYCbNzPSs@wooledge.org

I do not know the mechanism by which my addition and deletions were done during boot, I had added the correct data to put eth0 at 192.168.71.100 in /e/n/i, and had deleted the line saying it was managed by networkmanager. The evidence I have is that the original file was restored, has only lo and the line giving credit to networkmanager was restored, my additions were gone. Based on the evidence I can see, what else am I supposed to think? Maybe something in armbian-config overwrote it. IDK, but thats the clues I have. But I have NOT found ambian-config yet.
.

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis


Reply to: