Re: Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?
From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 23:54:31 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] uj08o7$cdv$2@ciao.gmane.io>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20231114120047.GA134833@zira.vinc17.org>
References: <[🔎] 20231114120047.GA134833@zira.vinc17.org>

On 14/11/2023 19:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

To my surprise, reportbug asks me to use bullseye-backports
(= oldstable-backports) on my bookworm (= stable) machine:


Might it happen that you have bullseye-backports in apt sources.list?

    apt policy
    apt policy linux-image-amd64

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?
  - From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>

References:
- Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?
  - From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Password managers
Next by Date: Re: claws-mail
Previous by thread: Re: Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?
Next by thread: Re: Why is bullseye-backports recommended on bookworm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread