Re: A file synchronization tool that respects hardlinks
On 22 Oct 2023 17:40 +0300, from debian@itayf.fastmail.fm (Itay):
> The sync must be bidirectional and *respect hardlinks* because many
> subdirs are kept under the control of darcs[1] which by default uses
> hardlinks. The sync tool I used in the past, unison[2], does not
> respect hardlinks[3].
What do you mean by "respect hardlinks"? To preserve the multiple
names as pointing to the same file system object (inode in classic
*nix parlace)?
--
Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se
“Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
Reply to: