On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 07:37:04 -0400 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote: > When I follow the link to [3], and look at the bottom of the page, I see > what looks to me like an explanation Ah, I get it. That's indeed a good explanation. Then the state of "vulnerable" is simply wrong, because it's actually "not applicable". Someone should fix the Debian security tracker. ;-) Thank you Wanderer, hede