On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 12:12:49AM +0000, davidson wrote:
The foregoing demonstration is meant to show how, using alpine's
threaded mode, I minimise my irritation with threads that I find
irrelevant to my interests
Unfortunately no matter how advanced your MUA is, it doesn't help
against prolific posters who derail nearly every thread with
copious amounts of irrelevance and outright false information.
This is a higher bar than merely neutralising the disruption (to
one's own use of the list) caused by a popular thread that one has
little interest in.
And here, my instincts are screaming "Leave it here. Stop
now. Leave well enough alone for the sake of all that is holy!"
However, and speaking only for myself, I'll bite:
Being able to see a thread's messages structured as a tree of
message headers (author, subject) can indeed help me infer quite a
bit about what's going on, before I bother to dig in and actually
read any of the messages' content.
For example, let P and Q be two regularly prolific participants, P
with exceptionally high signal-to-noise contributions, and Q a hot
willfully clueless mess. If there is a branch of the tree that is
just a chain of back-and-forth between P and Q --Q.P.Q.P.Q...--
then I know what's going on in there and so some OTHER branch will
be my first destination, unless I'm in the mood for a laugh.
You can easily see from looking at most of the large threads here,
the points at which they go off the rails and the common factors
involved there.
I can indeed. Without seeing the tree structure, I do not think it
would be so easy to see.
It is a difficult problem to solve as mailing lists like this tend
to promote a volume-wins approach,
You may be correct, but this isn't clear to me. (Unless the object
of the game is to annoy the greatest number of participants.)
and the baseline user will not have an advanced MUA nor necessarily
the experience to know that they're reading nonsense.
When I conquer the world, you will know because /etc/motd will
contain something like this:
Don't enter commands you don't understand, and you won't
understand the commands unless you read the manual. If you read
the manual, you STILL may not understand the
commands. Nevertheless, keep trying, Curious Human. We are
rooting for you!
Things get easier when you use an advanced MUA, so people should
invest the time to do so, but let's not pretend that this will avoid
a mega-thread next time some outlandish thread hijack by one of the
usual suspects happens.
My point was simply this: threads I've lost interest in (regardless
of size) are a single line in my mailbox, provided I do not delete
its initial message.
Does this particular thread go much better if you assume that
everyone participating (except the OP, who doesn't know how to
unsubscribe, or how to spell it) is fully competent at efficiently
managing email but still posts as they posted?
Funnily enough, if you look carefully, you can see some utterly
slapstick confusion of that very nature in this thread, over who is to
blame for posting a red-herring link to the Alpine Linux distro
mailing list:
%<---------------------------------------------------------------------------
18159 Thursday glenn green (6K) . UNUBSCRIBE
... ... ... ... ...
[1] 18192 Yesterday fjd (7K) . | \-Alpine was
[2] 18193 Yesterday Bret Busby (8K) . | |-Re: Alpi
[6] 18194 5:55 fjd (7K) | | |-Re: Al
[7] 18195 6:11 fjd (8K) | | \-Re: Al
[3] 18196 Yesterday Jeffrey Walton (7K) . | \-Re: Alpi
[4] 18197 Yesterday Greg Wooledge (5K) . | \-Re: Al
[5] 18198 2:41 Bret Busby (9K) . | \-Re:
18199 Yesterday David Wright (6K) | \-Re
--------------------------------------------------------------------------->%
Somebody requests a link to an alpine MUA forum or mailing list.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00333.html
Somebody posts a link to an alpine MUA mailing list.
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00341.html
Somebody else posts a red-herring link, to a mailing list concerning
the linux distro called Alpine Linux.
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00355.html
Then Greg points out, in reply to the red-herring poster, that they
have posted a red herring. <-- Here is where the tree structure view
is illuminating.
[4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00356.html
And then the person who had posted the CORRECT link in the first
place apologises for posting the wrong one, and posts the very same
correct link once again. <-- This person, it would seem, is reading
messages as a SEQUENCE, not as a TREE. (Because the tree makes
clear to whom each message is a reply.)
[5] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00360.html
(The person who really HAD posted the red herring says nothing.)
And then yet another person chimes in to thank the poster of the
correct MUA list link. And then he follows up, informing us all
that he has just realised (from reading debian-user, not from
examination of the link's target) that this (correct) link has been
subsequently discovered to be incorrect.
[6] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00381.html
[7] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/08/msg00382.html