[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

OT: Pedantic, yet wrong



Am 21/06/2023 um 15:46 schrieb tomas@tuxteam.de:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 02:07:30PM +0000, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Hi,

I posted this to the debian-init-diversity, but it's a low traffic list and
I am posting here just in case, apologising for the possible off topic.

(we

We who? You should do your homework. I've been on/off on this list since 2006.


don't appreciate top posting around here)

You've managed to be pedantic and patronising yet wrong. When the message is forwarded ("Weitergeleitet", you should know this, since you use a *.de domain), you have no other choice than to top post because the forwarded message is not indented. It would make no sense to bottom post because there would be no way to tell the comment apart from the post. This is obvious to most but not to you.


-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Upgrade Bullseye to Bookworm, and getting of rid of systemd?
Datum: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:09 +0100
Von: Ottavio Caruso
An: debian-init-diversity@

Is it at least theoretically possible to upgrade (as opposite to
install from scratch and/or converting Debian to Devuan) stock Debian
Bullseye to Bookworm and getting rid of systemd?

I just did a fresh bookworm install.

If you had taken the time to read my OP, I wrote "upgrade (as opposite to install from scratch".

You're welcome.

--
Ottavio Caruso

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?



Reply to: