Re: relevance of packages in repositories

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: relevance of packages in repositories
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 15:19:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ZFelbgsr6K2kdVp4@tuxteam.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1683454497.960099801@f750.i.mail.ru>
References: <[🔎] 1683454497.960099801@f750.i.mail.ru>

On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
> 
> [...] it really pisses you off [...]

Oh, it does?

Very nasty, it is.

Cheers
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: relevance of packages in repositories
  - From: gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>

References:
- relevance of packages in repositories
  - From: Дмитрий <demonik_82@mail.ru>

Prev by Date: Re: EPSON ET M 1120 new printer: If You can read this, you are using the wrong driver
Next by Date: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2023 #416
Previous by thread: Re: relevance of packages in repositories
Next by thread: Re: relevance of packages in repositories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread