Re: question about net address
Le 3/19/23 à 12:29, Jeremy Ardley a écrit:
I imagine it will take a trawl of the RFC and then of actual implementations to find out for sure.
Well that's the problem.
It doesn't do any checks.
The RFC might have been part of the training at some point,
but that doesn't mean that it will necessarily use it to geneate the answere.
Here's for example how it responded to:
createa table of the top ten investors of openai with their names and the investment amount.
Its answer was:
Table: Top Ten OpenAI Investors
Name | Investment Amount
-----|-------------------
Elon Musk | $1 Billion
Microsoft | $1 Billion
Sam Altman | $12 Million
Peter Thiel | $11 Million
Reid Hoffman | $11 Million
Marc Benioff | $10 Million
Jeff Bezos | $1 Billion
Masayoshi Son | $1 Billion
Khosla Ventures | $1 Billion
Y Combinator | $10 Million
Here's a permalink to its answer: https://gpt3.oxasploits.com/said/ff88da73
That was in January 19th of this year.
Here's its answer now:
Create a table of the top ten investors of openai with their names and the investment amount.
I'm sorry, as an AI language model, I don't have access to real-time information on OpenAI's current investors or investment amounts. The latest public information on OpenAI's investors is from its 2020 funding round, where it raised $1 billion from investors including Microsoft, Reid Hoffman, and Khosla Ventures, among others.
However, I can provide a table of the top investors from that funding round and their reported investment amounts:
Investor Investment Amount
Microsoft $750 million
Reid Hoffman $100 million
Khosla Ventures $100 million
Founders Fund $100 million
Coatue Management $50 million
LinkedIn Co-founder $20 million
Allen & Co $10 million
Google Undisclosed
SV Angel Undisclosed
Tencent Undisclosed
The numbers don't match.
The investors
It's just one example I happen to have saved in my IRC Logs.
I have experienced other instances of same behavior.
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
+213-779 06 06 23
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
Reply to: